PostHog · Managed platform
Last updated · Written by Temps, one of the products compared. Sources and method
Temps vs PostHog
Fewer analytics features. No event quota.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Is Temps better than PostHog? It depends on what you need. Here is what each one is, and what PostHog has that Temps doesn't.
- PostHog
- PostHog is a product analytics platform with funnels, cohorts, retention analysis, experiments, feature flags and SQL access to your data. Its free tier covers 1M events and 5k web replays a month, after which it bills from $0.00005 per event and $0.005 per recording.
- Temps
- Temps provides web analytics and session replay attached to the platform you deploy on, unmetered and bounded by disk rather than by plan. Its analytics come with the install; self-hosting PostHog's stack wants a 4 vCPU / 16 GB machine of its own.
- What PostHog has that Temps doesn't
- Cohorts, retention analysis, experiments, surveys and SQL access, none of which Temps offers, and feature flags with targeting rules and percentage rollouts (Temps' flags are per-environment values with a kill switch). Temps has funnels, but they are basic and defined through its API.
Scored, dimension by dimension
Product analytics depth
PostHogTemps
Pageviews, events, funnels basics
PostHog
Funnels, cohorts, retention, experiments
Feature flags and A/B testing
PostHogTemps
Per-environment flags and kill switch; no targeting or A/B tests
PostHog
Built in
Event and replay metering
TempsTemps
Unmetered — bounded by disk
PostHog
$0.00005/event, $0.005/recording past free tier
Bundled with deployment
TempsTemps
Same binary as your PaaS
PostHog
Separate product to run or subscribe to
Self-hosting effort
TempsTemps
Included in the Temps install
PostHog
4 vCPU / 16 GB box for the OSS stack
| Dimension | Temps | PostHog | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product analytics depth | Pageviews, events, funnels basics | Funnels, cohorts, retention, experiments | PostHog |
| Feature flags and A/B testing | Per-environment flags and kill switch; no targeting or A/B tests | Built in | PostHog |
| Event and replay metering | Unmetered — bounded by disk | $0.00005/event, $0.005/recording past free tier | Temps |
| Bundled with deployment | Same binary as your PaaS | Separate product to run or subscribe to | Temps |
| Self-hosting effort | Included in the Temps install | 4 vCPU / 16 GB box for the OSS stack | Temps |
Why teams switch from PostHog
PostHog is the deeper analytics product and its free tier is unusually generous — 1M events and 5,000 session replays a month. Temps competes on a narrower claim: analytics and replay that arrive with your deployment platform, self-host cleanly, and do not meter events.
- No event quota when self-hosted
- Temps analytics are not metered. PostHog's own docs say a self-hosted open-source deployment runs on a single machine and is "unlikely to scale past a couple 100ks events without significant effort in scaling", and their deployment guide asks whether you expect to exceed 300k events a month before recommending Cloud. A busy self-hosted install is outside what they support.
- Self-hosting is the primary path
- Temps is built to be self-hosted and supported that way under MIT / Apache 2.0. PostHog's open-source deployment comes with no customer support and no guarantees by their own documentation.
- One binary, not a cluster
- PostHog's self-hosted deployment guide asks for the equivalent of a Hetzner VM with 4 vCPU, 16GB of RAM and more than 30GB of storage, running a multi-service stack. Temps' analytics run inside the same Rust binary (beside Docker and a TimescaleDB container) that also handles deployments, error tracking and uptime monitoring.
- Analytics attached to your deploys
- Because Temps ships the app and collects its analytics, a traffic change sits next to the deployment that caused it without wiring up a release annotation.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Web analytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, unmetered self-hostedPostHog
YesDeeper product analyticsSession replay
Temps
Yesrrweb-basedPostHog
Yes5,000/mo free, then per recordingFunnel analysis
Temps
YesBuilt-in, defined via APIPostHog
YesDeeper, and a core strengthCohorts
Temps
NoPostHog
YesCore strengthFeature flags
Temps
YesPer-environment flags and kill switch; targeting rules and rollouts not shipped yetPostHog
Yes1M requests/mo free, with targeting and rolloutsA/B testing and experiments
Temps
NoPostHog
YesSurveys
Temps
NoPostHog
YesData warehouse
Temps
NoPostHog
YesError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatible DSNPostHog
Yes100k exceptions/mo freeUptime monitoring
Temps
Yes60s checks built inPostHog
NoDeployments
Temps
YesGit-push PaaSPostHog
NoNot a deployment platformManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesHA clustersPostHog
NoEvent quota
Temps
YesNone when self-hostedPostHog
NoMetered above the free tierOpen source
Temps
YesMIT / Apache 2.0PostHog
YesMIT, except the ee directorySupported self-hosting
Temps
YesPostHog
NoNo support or guarantees for open-source deployments
What it actually costs
PostHog's free tier is genuinely generous and most small products will never pay for it. The comparison is not really about price at that scale — it is about whether you want a deep, metered analytics suite as a separate system, or lighter analytics that come with the platform and are not metered when you run them yourself.
| Scenario | Temps | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | $0 self-hosted, unmetered | 1M events, 5k web replays, 1M flag requests |
| Analytics beyond free | $0 (included) | From $0.00005 per event |
| Session replay beyond free | $0 (included) | From $0.005 per web recording |
| Infrastructure | Free on your own VPS | $0 hosted, or a 4 vCPU / 16GB box to self-host |
PostHog prices as of October 2026, from its published pricing page. Temps prices from /pricing.
Which one should you choose?
Choose Temps if you…
- You want analytics and session replay included with your deployment platform
- You expect to exceed a few hundred thousand events/month on a self-hosted install
- You want a single binary rather than a multi-service analytics stack
- Analytics data must stay on your own infrastructure with supported self-hosting
- You need deployments, error tracking and uptime monitoring in the same tool
What PostHog does better than Temps
- You need funnels, cohorts, retention analysis or experiments — PostHog is much stronger
- Feature flags with targeting and rollouts, or A/B testing, are part of your workflow
- You want a data warehouse and SQL access to your product data
- You are inside the free tier and value analytical depth over bundling
- You want a hosted product with dedicated support
Migrating from PostHog
Medium difficulty
Swap the PostHog snippet for @temps-sdk/react-analytics. Pageviews and custom events map across directly, and session replay is rrweb-based on both sides. What does not map is anything built on PostHog's analysis layer — cohorts, experiments, surveys and PostHog's deeper funnel analysis have no full Temps equivalent (Temps has basic funnels and per-environment feature flags without targeting), so audit what your team actually depends on before switching. Historical events do not transfer.
Frequently asked questions
Is PostHog free?
PostHog's free tier includes 1M product analytics events, 5,000 web session recordings, 1M feature flag requests and 100k error tracking exceptions per month. Usage beyond that is billed per unit.
Can I self-host PostHog for free?
Yes — PostHog is MIT licensed apart from its ee directory, and a posthog-foss repository exists. Their documentation says an open-source deployment is "unlikely to scale past a couple 100ks events without significant effort", uses 300k events a month as the point to reconsider, and states plainly that self-hosted users cannot receive commercial support and that PostHog cannot help debug or recover from data loss.
Does Temps replace PostHog?
Only for pageviews, custom events, funnels and session replay. Temps has no cohorts, experiments or surveys, its feature flags are a Phase 1 per-environment kill switch without targeting or percentage rollouts, and PostHog's funnel analysis is considerably deeper than ours. If any of those are central to how you work, PostHog is the right tool.
Further reading
Self-Hosted Web Analytics in Temps
What the built-in analytics, session replay and funnels cover, with a Plausible and PostHog comparison.
Analytics Setup: Events, Funnels and Web Vitals
What Temps analytics records, how funnels are defined, and the two first-party cookies it sets.
Session Replay Setup: rrweb SDK and Masking
Turn on replay per project, mask inputs and play sessions back next to errors.
7 Best Plausible Alternatives for Web Analytics
PostHog, Temps and other privacy-first analytics tools compared on pricing and depth.
Best PostHog Alternatives 2026: Self-Hosted Options
Temps, Umami, Matomo, OpenReplay, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude and Clarity compared on pricing, replay and self-hosting.
Temps vs Plausible
The lighter end of the comparison: focused web analytics against a bundled platform.
6 best self-hosted session replay tools
If session replay is the part of PostHog you use, six self-hosted options compared.
How we researched this comparison
PostHog free-tier allowances and per-unit rates read from PostHog's public pricing page; licence from the GitHub repository; scaling limits, hardware requirements and support position from PostHog's self-hosting documentation. No benchmarks were run.
Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared. Reviewed by David Viejo, founder of Temps.
Ready to switch from PostHog?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it with a Premium licence. Temps Cloud, a hosted control plane for your own servers, is $29/month in an invite-only beta, with your servers billed separately.