Temps vs PostHog
Researched and updated 2026-08-07
Fewer analytics features. No event quota.
PostHog is the deeper analytics product and its free tier is unusually generous — 1M events and 5,000 session replays a month. Temps competes on a narrower claim: analytics and replay that arrive with your deployment platform, self-host cleanly, and do not meter events.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Choose Temps if you…
- You want analytics and session replay included with your deployment platform
- You expect to exceed a few hundred thousand events/month on a self-hosted install
- You want a single binary rather than a multi-service analytics stack
- Analytics data must stay on your own infrastructure with supported self-hosting
- You need deployments, error tracking and uptime monitoring in the same tool
Choose PostHog if you…
- You need funnels, cohorts, retention analysis or experiments — PostHog is much stronger
- Feature flags or A/B testing are part of your workflow
- You want a data warehouse and SQL access to your product data
- You are inside the free tier and value analytical depth over bundling
- You want a hosted product with dedicated support
Why teams switch from PostHog
- No event quota when self-hosted
- Temps analytics are not metered. PostHog's own docs say a self-hosted open-source deployment runs on a single machine and is "unlikely to scale past a couple 100ks events without significant effort in scaling", and their deployment guide asks whether you expect to exceed 300k events a month before recommending Cloud. A busy self-hosted install is outside what they support.
- Self-hosting is the primary path
- Temps is built to be self-hosted and supported that way under Apache 2.0. PostHog's open-source deployment comes with no customer support and no guarantees by their own documentation.
- One binary, not a cluster
- PostHog's self-hosted deployment guide asks for the equivalent of a Hetzner VM with 4 vCPU, 16GB of RAM and more than 30GB of storage, running a multi-service stack. Temps is a single Rust binary that also handles deployments, error tracking and uptime monitoring.
- Analytics attached to your deploys
- Because Temps ships the app and collects its analytics, a traffic change sits next to the deployment that caused it without wiring up a release annotation.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Web analytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, unmetered self-hostedPostHog
YesDeeper product analyticsSession replay
Temps
Yesrrweb-basedPostHog
Yes5,000/mo free, then per recordingFunnel analysis
Temps
YesBuilt-in, defined via APIPostHog
YesDeeper, and a core strengthCohorts
Temps
NoPostHog
YesCore strengthFeature flags
Temps
NoPostHog
Yes1M requests/mo freeA/B testing and experiments
Temps
NoPostHog
YesSurveys
Temps
NoPostHog
YesData warehouse
Temps
NoPostHog
YesError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatible DSNPostHog
Yes100k exceptions/mo freeUptime monitoring
Temps
Yes60s checks built inPostHog
NoDeployments
Temps
YesGit-push PaaSPostHog
NoNot a deployment platformManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesHA clustersPostHog
NoEvent quota
Temps
YesNone when self-hostedPostHog
NoMetered above the free tierOpen source
Temps
YesApache 2.0PostHog
YesMIT, except the ee directorySupported self-hosting
Temps
YesPostHog
NoNo support or guarantees for open-source deployments
What it actually costs
PostHog's free tier is genuinely generous and most small products will never pay for it. The comparison is not really about price at that scale — it is about whether you want a deep, metered analytics suite as a separate system, or lighter analytics that come with the platform and are not metered when you run them yourself.
| Scenario | Temps | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | $0 self-hosted, unmetered | 1M events, 5k web replays, 1M flag requests |
| Analytics beyond free | $0 (included) | From $0.00005 per event |
| Session replay beyond free | $0 (included) | From $0.005 per web recording |
| Infrastructure | ~$6/mo on your own VPS | $0 hosted, or a 4 vCPU / 16GB box to self-host |
Migrating from PostHog
Medium difficulty
Swap the PostHog snippet for @temps-sdk/react-analytics. Pageviews and custom events map across directly, and session replay is rrweb-based on both sides. What does not map is anything built on PostHog's analysis layer — funnels, cohorts, experiments and feature flags have no Temps equivalent, so audit what your team actually depends on before switching. Historical events do not transfer.
Frequently asked questions
Is PostHog free?
PostHog's free tier includes 1M product analytics events, 5,000 web session recordings, 1M feature flag requests and 100k error tracking exceptions per month. Usage beyond that is billed per unit.
Can I self-host PostHog for free?
Yes — PostHog is MIT licensed apart from its ee directory, and a posthog-foss repository exists. Their documentation says an open-source deployment is "unlikely to scale past a couple 100ks events without significant effort", uses 300k events a month as the point to reconsider, and states plainly that self-hosted users cannot receive commercial support and that PostHog cannot help debug or recover from data loss.
Does Temps replace PostHog?
Only for pageviews, custom events, funnels and session replay. Temps has no cohorts, experiments, surveys or feature flags, and PostHog's funnel analysis is considerably deeper than ours. If any of those are central to how you work, PostHog is the right tool.
How we researched this comparison
PostHog free-tier allowances and per-unit rates read from PostHog's public pricing page; licence from the GitHub repository; scaling limits, hardware requirements and support position from PostHog's self-hosting documentation. No benchmarks were run.
Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared.
Ready to switch from PostHog?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it on Temps Cloud from ~$6/mo.