Plausible · Managed platform
Last updated · Written by Temps, one of the products compared. Sources and method
Temps vs Plausible
First-party analytics, plus the rest of the platform.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Is Temps better than Plausible? It depends on what you need. Here is what each one is, and what Plausible has that Temps doesn't.
- What they share
- Both keep analytics first-party with no third-party trackers. Plausible is cookieless (it hashes the IP with a daily salt), while Temps sets two first-party cookies (_temps_visitor_id and _temps_sid), so consent requirements can differ.
- Where they diverge
- Plausible is a focused web analytics product at $9/month for 10K pageviews and $19/month for 100K, with no free tier beyond a 30-day trial. Temps self-hosts free with unlimited sites and adds error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring, which Plausible does not do.
- What Plausible has that Temps doesn't
- A more mature and more polished analytics product, and a script of about 1.3KB gzipped — Temps' is larger because it also carries replay and error capture.
Scored, dimension by dimension
Cookies and consent
PlausibleTemps
Two first-party cookies
Plausible
Cookieless (daily-salted IP hash)
Analytics depth and polish
PlausibleTemps
Solid, younger product
Plausible
Focused, mature, best-in-class
Tracking script size
PlausibleTemps
Larger — replay and errors included
Plausible
About 1.3KB gzipped
Cost
TempsTemps
$0 self-hosted, unlimited sites
Plausible
$9–19/mo by pageviews and sites
Errors, replay and uptime
TempsTemps
Included
Plausible
Not offered — separate vendors
| Dimension | Temps | Plausible | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cookies and consent | Two first-party cookies | Cookieless (daily-salted IP hash) | Plausible |
| Analytics depth and polish | Solid, younger product | Focused, mature, best-in-class | Plausible |
| Tracking script size | Larger — replay and errors included | About 1.3KB gzipped | Plausible |
| Cost | $0 self-hosted, unlimited sites | $9–19/mo by pageviews and sites | Temps |
| Errors, replay and uptime | Included | Not offered — separate vendors | Temps |
Why teams switch from Plausible
Plausible does one thing extremely well: lightweight, cookieless web analytics with a script of about 1.3KB gzipped. Temps' analytics are not more sophisticated, and unlike Plausible they set two first-party cookies. The difference is that they come with deployments, session replay, error tracking and uptime monitoring rather than as a $9–19/month subscription of their own.
- No pageview tiers
- Plausible's hosted pricing is banded by monthly pageviews, starting at $9/month for 10,000. Self-hosted Temps analytics are not metered, so traffic growth does not move you up a plan.
- Session replay included
- Plausible is deliberately analytics-only and does not offer session replay. Temps includes rrweb-based replay, which is the usual second subscription beside a privacy-first analytics tool.
- Different routes to the same privacy stance
- Plausible is genuinely cookieless — it identifies visitors by hashing the IP, which is the stronger position and the reason it needs no consent banner. Temps' proxy sets two first-party HttpOnly cookies (_temps_visitor_id and _temps_sid) and its SDK uses localStorage, so it is first-party and self-hosted but not cookieless; check your own consent obligations rather than assuming they carry over. What Temps does add is that the data never leaves your infrastructure.
- One binary for the whole stack
- Deployments, analytics, session replay, error tracking and uptime monitoring in a single Rust binary, with managed Postgres on the same server, rather than an analytics service you run beside everything else.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Cookieless analytics
Temps
NoTwo first-party cookies + localStoragePlausible
YesGenuinely cookieless (daily-salted IP hash)Privacy-first, no third-party trackers
Temps
YesPlausible
YesLightweight tracking script
Temps
YesPlausible
YesAbout 1.3KB gzipped — smaller than oursGoals and conversions
Temps
YesPlausible
YesMature and well-designedSession replay
Temps
Yesrrweb-basedPlausible
NoNot offered by designError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatible DSNPlausible
NoUptime monitoring
Temps
Yes60s checksPlausible
NoDeployments
Temps
YesGit-push PaaSPlausible
NoNot a deployment platformManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesPlausible
NoFree to run permanently
Temps
YesSelf-hosted, MIT / Apache 2.0Plausible
YesSelf-hosted Community Edition; the hosted product is trial-onlyPageview-based pricing
Temps
NoNot metered self-hostedPlausible
YesSelf-hostable
Temps
YesMIT / Apache 2.0Plausible
YesCommunity editionFocused single-purpose product
Temps
NoPlausible
YesA genuine advantage if analytics is all you need
What it actually costs
If web analytics is genuinely all you need, Plausible at $9/month is inexpensive and excellent, and bundling is not a reason to switch. The case for Temps appears when analytics is one of four tools you are paying for — at which point the comparison is not $9 against nothing, it is one subscription against several.
| Scenario | Temps | Plausible |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | $0 self-hosted | $9/mo — up to 10k pageviews |
| Growth | $0 (included) | $14/mo — up to 3 sites |
| Business | $0 (included) | $19/mo — up to 10 sites |
| Free tier | Unlimited self-hosted | None — 30-day trial, no card required |
| Infrastructure | Free on your own VPS | $0 hosted, or self-host the community edition |
Plausible prices as of October 2026, from its published pricing page. Temps prices from /pricing.
Which one should you choose?
Choose Temps if you…
- You want analytics, session replay, error tracking and deploys in one tool
- You do not want pricing banded by monthly pageviews
- You need session replay, which Plausible does not offer
- You are already self-hosting your platform and want analytics to live there
- You want the analytics to come with the platform rather than run as a fifth service
What Plausible does better than Temps
- Web analytics is all you need — Plausible is focused and does it very well
- You want the smallest possible tracking script; Plausible's is about 1.3KB gzipped
- You want a mature, hosted, privacy-first product with no server to run
- You value a single-purpose tool over a bundled platform
- $9/month is not a cost you are trying to remove
Migrating from Plausible
Easy difficulty
Replace the Plausible script with @temps-sdk/react-analytics. Pageviews and goals map directly, but the consent position does not carry over: Plausible is cookieless, and Temps sets two first-party cookies, so re-check whether your jurisdiction requires a banner before you assume it does not. Historical data does not transfer — Plausible can export CSV, but there is no import path here, so run both in parallel if the history matters. Expect small discrepancies between any two analytics tools; they count bots and sessions differently.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Plausible cost?
The Starter plan is $9/month for up to 10,000 monthly pageviews, Growth is $14/month for up to 3 sites and Business is $19/month for up to 10 sites. There is a 30-day free trial with no card required, but no permanent free tier on the hosted product.
Is Plausible open source?
Yes. Plausible Community Edition is the free, self-hosted release under the AGPL v3, so you can run it yourself instead of paying for the hosted product.
Is Temps cookieless like Plausible?
No. Plausible sets no cookies and identifies visitors with a hash of the IP, user agent and a salt rotated every 24 hours. Temps' proxy sets two first-party HttpOnly cookies, _temps_visitor_id (365 days) and _temps_sid (30 minutes), and stores the data on your own server. Neither uses third-party trackers, but check your consent obligations for Temps rather than assuming Plausible's carry over.
Does Temps do everything Plausible does?
For pageviews, referrers and goals, broadly yes. Plausible is the more focused and more polished analytics product, with a smaller script. Temps adds session replay, error tracking, uptime monitoring and deployments around it.
Further reading
Self-Hosted Web Analytics in Temps
What the built-in analytics, session replay and funnels cover, with a Plausible and PostHog comparison.
Analytics Setup: Events, Funnels and Web Vitals
How Temps analytics works, including the two first-party cookies it sets and what they store.
Data ownership and privacy
Where Temps keeps analytics, replay and error data, and what that means for consent.
7 Best Plausible Alternatives for Web Analytics
Privacy-first analytics tools compared on pricing, cookies and self-hosting.
Self-Hosted Sentry and Plausible Alternatives
Replacing an error tracker and an analytics tool with self-hosted options.
Best PostHog alternatives 2026
Plausible, Umami, Matomo, Temps and others, for teams choosing a lighter analytics tool.
How we researched this comparison
Plausible plan prices and trial terms read from Plausible's pricing page; its cookieless method from its data policy; the Community Edition licence from its self-hosting page, all on 2026-10-08. Temps' cookies from the Temps analytics docs and source. No benchmarks were run.
Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared. Reviewed by David Viejo, founder of Temps.
Ready to switch from Plausible?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it with a Premium licence. Temps Cloud, a hosted control plane for your own servers, is $29/month in an invite-only beta, with your servers billed separately.