CapRover · Self-hosted
Last updated · Written by Temps, one of the products compared. Sources and method
Temps vs CapRover
Same deploys. Observability included.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Is Temps better than CapRover? It depends on what you need. Here is what each one is, and what CapRover has that Temps doesn't.
- What they share
- Both are free, open-source, self-hosted PaaS platforms with git-based deploys, automatic SSL and multi-node support (Temps under MIT / Apache 2.0, CapRover under Apache 2.0).
- Where they diverge
- Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay, uptime monitoring and HA-capable managed databases. CapRover ships server metrics through NetData but leaves application observability and database HA to you: matching what Temps bundles costs about $211/month of SaaS (Plausible, Sentry Team, LogRocket) or several more services to operate.
- What CapRover has that Temps doesn't
- A large one-click app catalogue and years of production use on Docker Swarm. Temps is pre-1.0 (v0.1.0 prereleases) with a smaller catalogue.
Scored, dimension by dimension
Licence and hosting cost
TieTemps
$0, MIT / Apache 2.0, self-hosted
CapRover
$0, Apache 2.0, self-hosted
Built-in observability
TempsTemps
Analytics, errors, replay, uptime
CapRover
Server metrics only; ~$211/mo of SaaS to match
Managed databases
TempsTemps
Postgres (with HA), MariaDB, MongoDB, Redis
CapRover
Single containers, HA is yours to build
One-click app catalogue
CapRoverTemps
Smaller
CapRover
Large, genuinely useful catalogue
Maturity
CapRoverTemps
Pre-1.0 (v0.1.0 prereleases)
CapRover
Years of production use on Docker Swarm
| Dimension | Temps | CapRover | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licence and hosting cost | $0, MIT / Apache 2.0, self-hosted | $0, Apache 2.0, self-hosted | Tie |
| Built-in observability | Analytics, errors, replay, uptime | Server metrics only; ~$211/mo of SaaS to match | Temps |
| Managed databases | Postgres (with HA), MariaDB, MongoDB, Redis | Single containers, HA is yours to build | Temps |
| One-click app catalogue | Smaller | Large, genuinely useful catalogue | CapRover |
| Maturity | Pre-1.0 (v0.1.0 prereleases) | Years of production use on Docker Swarm | CapRover |
Why teams switch from CapRover
CapRover and Temps are the closest comparison on this site: both are free, open-source (Temps MIT / Apache 2.0, CapRover Apache 2.0), self-hosted platforms that deploy by git push and scale across nodes. The difference is not deployment: CapRover's core has no analytics, error tracking, session replay or uptime monitoring, and Temps includes all four.
- Observability in the core
- CapRover deploys apps; monitoring is something you add from the one-click app store and then operate yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime checks in the same binary.
- Preview environments per pull request
- Temps creates a preview environment for every pull request automatically. On CapRover this is an app-per-branch convention you script and tear down yourself.
- Managed databases with HA
- CapRover's databases come from one-click apps — single containers you back up yourself. Temps provides managed PostgreSQL with high-availability clusters and scheduled backups.
- One binary, no Swarm to operate
- CapRover builds on Docker Swarm, so scaling means understanding Swarm. Temps handles multi-node itself, which is one fewer system in the failure path.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Git push deployments
Temps
YesCapRover
YesWeb dashboard
Temps
YesCapRover
YesLong-standing strengthDockerfile and buildpack builds
Temps
YesCapRover
YesMulti-server / clustering
Temps
YesBuilt inCapRover
YesVia Docker Swarm nodesAutomatic SSL
Temps
YesCapRover
YesOne-click app store
Temps
NoCapRover
YesLarge catalogue — a real advantagePreview environments
Temps
YesPer pull requestCapRover
NoManual app-per-branchManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesHA clusters, scheduled backupsCapRover
YesOne-click container, no HAS3-compatible storage
Temps
YesBuilt inCapRover
NoNot in core; MinIO available as a one-click appAnalytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, built inCapRover
NoNot in coreError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatibleCapRover
NoNot in coreSession replay
Temps
Yesrrweb-basedCapRover
NoUptime monitoring
Temps
Yes60s checks + alertingCapRover
NoNot in coreServer metrics
Temps
YesCapRover
YesVia NetDataTransactional email
Temps
YesThrough SES, Scaleway or an SMTP relayCapRover
NoOpen source
Temps
YesMIT / Apache 2.0CapRover
YesApache 2.0, with an appendix covering its paid featuresFree core
Temps
YesCapRover
YesSome features are paid
What it actually costs
Both are free and open source, so this is not a pricing comparison. The cost that differs is operational: on CapRover, analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring are either more services you run or SaaS subscriptions you buy (Plausible, Sentry Team and LogRocket come to about $211/month).
| Scenario | Temps | CapRover |
|---|---|---|
| Software | $0 — MIT / Apache 2.0 | $0 — Apache 2.0 |
| Infrastructure | Your own VPS | Your own VPS |
| With full observability | $0 (included) | $0 plus tools to run yourself, or ~$211/mo SaaS |
| With HA databases | $0 (included) | Single containers — HA is yours to build |
Which one should you choose?
Choose Temps if you…
- You want analytics, error tracking and uptime monitoring without adding services
- You want preview environments created per pull request automatically
- You need managed Postgres with high availability rather than a single container
- You would rather not operate Docker Swarm to scale across nodes
- You want session replay and transactional email in the same platform
What CapRover does better than Temps
- The one-click app store matters to you — it is a large, genuinely useful catalogue
- You already run Docker Swarm and are comfortable with it
- You want a mature project with years of production use behind it
- Deployment is all you need and you have observability elsewhere
- You prefer assembling your own stack from one-click components
Migrating from CapRover
Easy difficulty
Temps has a CapRover import wizard: it connects to your CapRover instance, discovers the apps and one-click databases, and recreates them as Temps projects with their build settings, environment variables and a live deployment. Anything it cannot move moves the usual way: images and Dockerfiles port directly, and databases need a dump and restore. The one thing without an equivalent is the one-click app store, so check what you have deployed from it before switching.
Frequently asked questions
Is CapRover free?
The core is. CapRover is released under the Apache 2.0 licence and is free to self-host. It also sells some paid features, and an appendix to its licence restricts modifying or redistributing those. Temps is MIT / Apache 2.0; its paid Premium edition is a separate licence.
Does CapRover support multiple servers?
Yes. CapRover supports clustering by adding nodes to a Docker Swarm cluster, and handles load balancing across them.
Does CapRover include monitoring or analytics?
Not in its core. Monitoring tools can be deployed from the one-click app catalogue, but you run and maintain them yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring in the platform.
Can I migrate from CapRover to Temps automatically?
Yes. The Temps import wizard connects to your CapRover instance, discovers the apps and one-click databases running on it, and recreates them as Temps projects with build settings, environment variables and a live deployment. The CapRover migration guide covers each step.
Is Temps or CapRover easier to start with?
They are comparable for a first deployment. CapRover has the larger one-click catalogue; Temps needs less assembly if you want observability, because it is already there.
Further reading
Migrate from CapRover With the Wizard
Connect Temps to your CapRover instance and recreate its apps and databases as Temps projects.
5 Best Coolify Alternatives for Self-Hosted PaaS
CapRover, Dokploy, Dokku and Temps compared on features and pricing.
Temps vs Coolify
The most popular self-hosted PaaS, compared on observability and templates.
Managed PostgreSQL on Temps
HA Postgres with scheduled backups, in place of a single one-click container.
7 best self-hosted deployment platforms
CapRover reviewed next to Temps, Coolify, Dokploy, Kamal, Dokku and Portainer.
How we researched this comparison
CapRover's licence, clustering model and feature scope read from caprover.com and its GitHub repository on 2026-10-08. Temps capabilities from this repository. No benchmarks were run.
Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared. Reviewed by David Viejo, founder of Temps.
Ready to switch from CapRover?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it with a Premium licence. Temps Cloud, a hosted control plane for your own servers, is $29/month in an invite-only beta, with your servers billed separately.