CapRover · Self-hosted

Last updated · Written by Temps, one of the products compared. Sources and method

Temps vs CapRover

Same deploys. Observability included.

Monthly cost at a glance

Temps
CapRover
Software
$0
$0
Infrastructure
Your own VPS
Your own VPS
With full observability
$0
$0 plus tools to run yourself,
With HA databases
$0
Single containers
$curl -fsSL https://temps.sh/deploy.sh | bash

The short answer

Is Temps better than CapRover? It depends on what you need. Here is what each one is, and what CapRover has that Temps doesn't.

What they share
Both are free, open-source, self-hosted PaaS platforms with git-based deploys, automatic SSL and multi-node support (Temps under MIT / Apache 2.0, CapRover under Apache 2.0).
Where they diverge
Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay, uptime monitoring and HA-capable managed databases. CapRover ships server metrics through NetData but leaves application observability and database HA to you: matching what Temps bundles costs about $211/month of SaaS (Plausible, Sentry Team, LogRocket) or several more services to operate.
What CapRover has that Temps doesn't
A large one-click app catalogue and years of production use on Docker Swarm. Temps is pre-1.0 (v0.1.0 prereleases) with a smaller catalogue.

Scored, dimension by dimension

  • Licence and hosting cost

    Tie

    Temps

    $0, MIT / Apache 2.0, self-hosted

    CapRover

    $0, Apache 2.0, self-hosted

  • Built-in observability

    Temps

    Temps

    Analytics, errors, replay, uptime

    CapRover

    Server metrics only; ~$211/mo of SaaS to match

  • Managed databases

    Temps

    Temps

    Postgres (with HA), MariaDB, MongoDB, Redis

    CapRover

    Single containers, HA is yours to build

  • One-click app catalogue

    CapRover

    Temps

    Smaller

    CapRover

    Large, genuinely useful catalogue

  • Maturity

    CapRover

    Temps

    Pre-1.0 (v0.1.0 prereleases)

    CapRover

    Years of production use on Docker Swarm

Why teams switch from CapRover

CapRover and Temps are the closest comparison on this site: both are free, open-source (Temps MIT / Apache 2.0, CapRover Apache 2.0), self-hosted platforms that deploy by git push and scale across nodes. The difference is not deployment: CapRover's core has no analytics, error tracking, session replay or uptime monitoring, and Temps includes all four.

Observability in the core
CapRover deploys apps; monitoring is something you add from the one-click app store and then operate yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime checks in the same binary.
Preview environments per pull request
Temps creates a preview environment for every pull request automatically. On CapRover this is an app-per-branch convention you script and tear down yourself.
Managed databases with HA
CapRover's databases come from one-click apps — single containers you back up yourself. Temps provides managed PostgreSQL with high-availability clusters and scheduled backups.
One binary, no Swarm to operate
CapRover builds on Docker Swarm, so scaling means understanding Swarm. Temps handles multi-node itself, which is one fewer system in the failure path.

Feature comparison

What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.

  • Git push deployments

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
  • Web dashboard

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
    Long-standing strength
  • Dockerfile and buildpack builds

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
  • Multi-server / clustering

    Temps

    Yes
    Built in

    CapRover

    Yes
    Via Docker Swarm nodes
  • Automatic SSL

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
  • One-click app store

    Temps

    No

    CapRover

    Yes
    Large catalogue — a real advantage
  • Preview environments

    Temps

    Yes
    Per pull request

    CapRover

    No
    Manual app-per-branch
  • Managed PostgreSQL

    Temps

    Yes
    HA clusters, scheduled backups

    CapRover

    Yes
    One-click container, no HA
  • S3-compatible storage

    Temps

    Yes
    Built in

    CapRover

    No
    Not in core; MinIO available as a one-click app
  • Analytics

    Temps

    Yes
    Privacy-first, built in

    CapRover

    No
    Not in core
  • Error tracking

    Temps

    Yes
    Sentry-compatible

    CapRover

    No
    Not in core
  • Session replay

    Temps

    Yes
    rrweb-based

    CapRover

    No
  • Uptime monitoring

    Temps

    Yes
    60s checks + alerting

    CapRover

    No
    Not in core
  • Server metrics

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
    Via NetData
  • Transactional email

    Temps

    Yes
    Through SES, Scaleway or an SMTP relay

    CapRover

    No
  • Open source

    Temps

    Yes
    MIT / Apache 2.0

    CapRover

    Yes
    Apache 2.0, with an appendix covering its paid features
  • Free core

    Temps

    Yes

    CapRover

    Yes
    Some features are paid

What it actually costs

Both are free and open source, so this is not a pricing comparison. The cost that differs is operational: on CapRover, analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring are either more services you run or SaaS subscriptions you buy (Plausible, Sentry Team and LogRocket come to about $211/month).

ScenarioTempsCapRover
Software$0 — MIT / Apache 2.0$0 — Apache 2.0
InfrastructureYour own VPSYour own VPS
With full observability$0 (included)$0 plus tools to run yourself, or ~$211/mo SaaS
With HA databases$0 (included)Single containers — HA is yours to build

Which one should you choose?

Choose Temps if you…

  • You want analytics, error tracking and uptime monitoring without adding services
  • You want preview environments created per pull request automatically
  • You need managed Postgres with high availability rather than a single container
  • You would rather not operate Docker Swarm to scale across nodes
  • You want session replay and transactional email in the same platform

What CapRover does better than Temps

  • The one-click app store matters to you — it is a large, genuinely useful catalogue
  • You already run Docker Swarm and are comfortable with it
  • You want a mature project with years of production use behind it
  • Deployment is all you need and you have observability elsewhere
  • You prefer assembling your own stack from one-click components

Migrating from CapRover

Easy difficulty

Temps has a CapRover import wizard: it connects to your CapRover instance, discovers the apps and one-click databases, and recreates them as Temps projects with their build settings, environment variables and a live deployment. Anything it cannot move moves the usual way: images and Dockerfiles port directly, and databases need a dump and restore. The one thing without an equivalent is the one-click app store, so check what you have deployed from it before switching.

Step-by-step: migrate from CapRover with the import wizard

Frequently asked questions

Is CapRover free?

The core is. CapRover is released under the Apache 2.0 licence and is free to self-host. It also sells some paid features, and an appendix to its licence restricts modifying or redistributing those. Temps is MIT / Apache 2.0; its paid Premium edition is a separate licence.

Does CapRover support multiple servers?

Yes. CapRover supports clustering by adding nodes to a Docker Swarm cluster, and handles load balancing across them.

Does CapRover include monitoring or analytics?

Not in its core. Monitoring tools can be deployed from the one-click app catalogue, but you run and maintain them yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring in the platform.

Can I migrate from CapRover to Temps automatically?

Yes. The Temps import wizard connects to your CapRover instance, discovers the apps and one-click databases running on it, and recreates them as Temps projects with build settings, environment variables and a live deployment. The CapRover migration guide covers each step.

Is Temps or CapRover easier to start with?

They are comparable for a first deployment. CapRover has the larger one-click catalogue; Temps needs less assembly if you want observability, because it is already there.

Related comparisons

Further reading

How we researched this comparison

CapRover's licence, clustering model and feature scope read from caprover.com and its GitHub repository on 2026-10-08. Temps capabilities from this repository. No benchmarks were run.

Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared. Reviewed by David Viejo, founder of Temps.

Ready to switch from CapRover?

Self-host Temps for free, or run it with a Premium licence. Temps Cloud, a hosted control plane for your own servers, is $29/month in an invite-only beta, with your servers billed separately.