Temps vs CapRover
Researched and updated 2026-08-07
Same deploys. Observability included.
CapRover and Temps are the closest comparison on this site: both are free, Apache 2.0, self-hosted platforms that deploy by git push and scale across nodes. The difference is not deployment — it is that CapRover's core has no analytics, error tracking or uptime monitoring, and Temps includes all three.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Choose Temps if you…
- You want analytics, error tracking and uptime monitoring without adding services
- You want preview environments created per pull request automatically
- You need managed Postgres with high availability rather than a single container
- You would rather not operate Docker Swarm to scale across nodes
- You want session replay and transactional email in the same platform
Choose CapRover if you…
- The one-click app store matters to you — it is a large, genuinely useful catalogue
- You already run Docker Swarm and are comfortable with it
- You want a mature project with years of production use behind it
- Deployment is all you need and you have observability elsewhere
- You prefer assembling your own stack from one-click components
Why teams switch from CapRover
- Observability in the core
- CapRover deploys apps; monitoring is something you add from the one-click app store and then operate yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime checks in the same binary.
- Preview environments per pull request
- Temps creates a preview environment for every pull request automatically. On CapRover this is an app-per-branch convention you script and tear down yourself.
- Managed databases with HA
- CapRover's databases come from one-click apps — single containers you back up yourself. Temps provides managed PostgreSQL with high-availability clusters and scheduled backups.
- One binary, no Swarm to operate
- CapRover builds on Docker Swarm, so scaling means understanding Swarm. Temps handles multi-node itself, which is one fewer system in the failure path.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Git push deployments
Temps
YesCapRover
YesWeb dashboard
Temps
YesCapRover
YesLong-standing strengthDockerfile and buildpack builds
Temps
YesCapRover
YesMulti-server / clustering
Temps
YesBuilt inCapRover
YesVia Docker Swarm nodesAutomatic SSL
Temps
YesCapRover
YesOne-click app store
Temps
NoCapRover
YesLarge catalogue — a real advantagePreview environments
Temps
YesPer pull requestCapRover
NoManual app-per-branchManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesHA clusters, scheduled backupsCapRover
YesOne-click container, no HAS3-compatible storage
Temps
YesBuilt inCapRover
NoNot in core; MinIO available as a one-click appAnalytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, built inCapRover
NoNot in coreError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatibleCapRover
NoNot in coreSession replay
Temps
Yesrrweb-basedCapRover
NoUptime monitoring
Temps
Yes60s checks + alertingCapRover
NoNot in coreTransactional email
Temps
YesSMTP, SES, Scaleway, CloudflareCapRover
NoOpen source
Temps
YesApache 2.0CapRover
YesApache 2.0Free forever
Temps
YesCapRover
Yes
What it actually costs
Both are free and Apache 2.0, so this is not a pricing comparison. The cost that differs is operational: on CapRover, analytics, error tracking and uptime monitoring are either four more services you run or four more SaaS subscriptions you buy.
| Scenario | Temps | CapRover |
|---|---|---|
| Software | $0 — Apache 2.0 | $0 — Apache 2.0 |
| Infrastructure | Your own VPS (~$6/mo) | Your own VPS (~$6/mo) |
| With full observability | $0 (included) | $0 plus tools to run yourself, or $50-150+/mo SaaS |
| With HA databases | $0 (included) | Single containers — HA is yours to build |
Migrating from CapRover
Easy difficulty
Both are container-based, so images and Dockerfiles port directly and captain-definition build settings map to Temps service definitions. Environment variables move one for one. Databases deployed as CapRover one-click apps need a dump and restore rather than a live migration. The one thing without an equivalent is the one-click app store, so check what you have deployed from it before switching.
Frequently asked questions
Is CapRover free?
Yes. CapRover is released under the Apache 2.0 licence and is free forever, with no paid tier and no vendor lock-in.
Does CapRover support multiple servers?
Yes. CapRover supports clustering by adding nodes to a Docker Swarm cluster, and handles load balancing across them.
Does CapRover include monitoring or analytics?
Not in its core. Monitoring tools can be deployed from the one-click app catalogue, but you run and maintain them yourself. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring in the platform.
Is Temps or CapRover easier to start with?
They are comparable for a first deployment. CapRover has the larger one-click catalogue; Temps needs less assembly if you want observability, because it is already there.
How we researched this comparison
CapRover's licence, clustering model and feature scope read from caprover.com. Temps capabilities from this repository. No benchmarks were run.
Disclosure: Temps publishes this page and is one of the products being compared.
Ready to switch from CapRover?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it on Temps Cloud from ~$6/mo.