Dokploy · Self-hosted
Last updated
Temps vs Dokploy
Self-hosting with everything built in
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
- What they share
- Both are free, open-source, self-hosted PaaS platforms with git-push deploys, automatic SSL and managed databases.
- Where they diverge
- Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay and uptime monitoring in the binary. Dokploy delegates them, which means four more services to run or $30–100+/month of SaaS.
- What Dokploy has that Temps doesn't
- Docker Swarm mode for multi-server clusters, a larger community at 37k+ GitHub stars, and SSO/SAML on its enterprise tier. Temps uses a WireGuard mesh for multi-node and its team roles are more basic.
Scored, dimension by dimension
Built-in observability
TempsTemps
Analytics, errors, replay, uptime
Dokploy
None — 4 extra services or SaaS
Cost with full observability
TempsTemps
$0 (included)
Dokploy
$0 + 4 services to run, or $30–100+/mo
Multi-server clustering
DokployTemps
WireGuard mesh, multi-node
Dokploy
Docker Swarm mode
Community size
DokployTemps
Younger, smaller
Dokploy
37k+ GitHub stars
Licence and self-hosting cost
TieTemps
Free, open source
Dokploy
Free, open source
| Dimension | Temps | Dokploy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built-in observability | Analytics, errors, replay, uptime | None — 4 extra services or SaaS | Temps |
| Cost with full observability | $0 (included) | $0 + 4 services to run, or $30–100+/mo | Temps |
| Multi-server clustering | WireGuard mesh, multi-node | Docker Swarm mode | Dokploy |
| Community size | Younger, smaller | 37k+ GitHub stars | Dokploy |
| Licence and self-hosting cost | Free, open source | Free, open source | Tie |
Why teams switch from Dokploy
Choose Temps if you want analytics, error tracking, session replay, and uptime monitoring built in; choose Dokploy if you want Docker Swarm mode for multi-server clusters and a larger community. Both are free and self-hosted, and both deploy Docker Compose stacks directly — the core difference is that Temps ships the full observability stack as a single binary, while Dokploy delegates it to external tools you set up separately.
- Built-in observability stack
- Dokploy delegates analytics, error tracking, and monitoring to external tools (Prometheus, Grafana, Sentry). Temps includes all four built-in.
- Single binary, zero dependencies
- Temps is one Rust binary. Dokploy is a distributed Node.js application that requires Docker, Traefik, and multiple containers to run.
- Sentry-compatible error tracking
- Drop-in Sentry replacement included. Use your existing SDK — just change the DSN endpoint. Dokploy has no error aggregation.
- Session replay built-in
- Watch real user sessions to debug UX issues. Dokploy requires external tools like OpenReplay or FullStory.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Git push deployments
Temps
YesDokploy
YesDocker support
Temps
YesDokploy
YesDocker Compose support
Temps
YesDokploy
YesAlso offers Docker Swarm modeAutomatic SSL
Temps
YesDokploy
YesCustom domains
Temps
YesDokploy
YesPreview deployments
Temps
YesDokploy
YesManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesDokploy
YesManaged Redis
Temps
YesDokploy
YesManaged MongoDB
Temps
YesDokploy
YesS3-compatible storage
Temps
YesBuilt-in (RustFS, MinIO supported)Dokploy
NoError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatibleDokploy
NoExternal tools requiredAnalytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, unlimitedDokploy
NoExternal tools requiredSession replay
Temps
YesBuilt-inDokploy
NoUptime monitoring
Temps
YesBuilt-in checks + alertingDokploy
NoUptime Kuma recommendedTransactional email
Temps
YesSMTP, SES, Scaleway, Cloudflare built inDokploy
NoMulti-server cluster
Temps
YesDokploy
YesDocker Swarm modeTeam management
Temps
YesBasic rolesDokploy
YesMulti-org with RBACSSO
Temps
YesOIDC built inDokploy
YesSAML on Enterprise tierOpen source
Temps
YesMIT / Apache 2.0Dokploy
YesApache 2.0
What it actually costs
Both are free to self-host. Dokploy Cloud is ~$4.50/server but has no built-in observability — you either run and maintain Prometheus, Grafana, Sentry/GlitchTip, and Uptime Kuma yourself, or pay $30–100+/mo for the SaaS equivalents. Temps includes the equivalent stack in one binary.
| Scenario | Temps | Dokploy |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | $0 | $0 |
| Cloud version | Coming soon | From $4.50/mo per server |
| With full observability | $0 (included) | $0 + 4 extra services to run, or $30–100+/mo SaaS |
| 5-person team + SSO | Free — your own VPS | $15/mo + observability costs |
Which one should you choose?
Choose Temps if you…
- You want error tracking, analytics, and monitoring without extra tools
- You prefer a single binary with minimal operational overhead
- You need session replay to debug user-facing issues
- You want uptime monitoring and alerting included
- You need transactional email built into your platform
- You want OIDC SSO without an enterprise tier
What Dokploy does better than Temps
- You want Docker Swarm mode for multi-server, multi-container clusters
- You already have a separate observability stack you prefer
- You need SSO/SAML on the Enterprise tier
- You prefer Dokploy's larger community (37k+ GitHub stars)
Migrating from Dokploy
Easy difficulty
Both platforms use identical Docker-based deployments, and both deploy Docker Compose stacks directly. Connect your git repos to Temps, replicate your environment variables, and redeploy — typically under an hour per app, including Compose-based apps via the Docker Compose preset. Converting a Compose stack into individual Temps services is optional, only useful if you want the built-in observability to instrument each container separately.
Frequently asked questions
Dokploy vs Temps: which should I choose?
Choose Temps if you want deployments plus built-in observability — it bundles web analytics, Sentry-compatible error tracking, session replay, and uptime monitoring into a single Rust binary, so you don't wire up Prometheus, Grafana, or Sentry yourself. Choose Dokploy if Docker Swarm mode for multi-server clusters matters to you, or if you want the larger community (37k+ GitHub stars). Both are free, open-source, self-hosted, and deploy Docker Compose stacks directly, with git-push deploys, automatic SSL, preview environments, and managed PostgreSQL/Redis/MongoDB.
What does Temps include that Dokploy doesn't?
Temps includes four things Dokploy delegates to external tools: web analytics (privacy-first, unlimited), error tracking (Sentry-compatible — point the official Sentry SDK at a Temps DSN), session replay, and uptime monitoring with alerting. It also bundles S3-compatible object storage and transactional email. Dokploy handles deployments well but expects you to run Prometheus/Grafana for metrics, an external Sentry or GlitchTip for errors, OpenReplay or FullStory for replay, and Uptime Kuma for monitoring.
What does Dokploy do better than Temps?
Dokploy has Docker Swarm mode for multi-server clusters, a larger community (37k+ GitHub stars), multi-org RBAC team management, and SSO/SAML on its enterprise tier. Temps' team roles are more basic and it has no Swarm-style multi-server orchestration. Both platforms support docker-compose.yml stacks as a first-class deployment method.
How much does each cost?
Both are free to self-host on your own server, and both offer a managed option. A Temps VPS costs only the server, with no per-seat fees or bandwidth overages. Dokploy Cloud hosts the control plane starting around $4.50/mo per server, while your apps still run on your own servers. The practical cost difference shows up in the observability stack: with Dokploy you also pay for (or self-host and maintain) separate analytics, error tracking, replay, and monitoring tools; with Temps those are included in the one binary.
Ready to switch from Dokploy?
Self-host Temps for free, or join Temps Cloud from $29/month for queryable managed telemetry, query compute, and offsite backups.