Temps vs Dokploy

Page Goal

Clearly differentiate Temps from Dokploy for users evaluating both self-hosted options. Be factual and fair while highlighting what makes Temps unique.

Target Persona

Comparison Connor - A developer who:

Researching self-hosted PaaS options
Found both Temps and Dokploy
Wants to understand differences
Will choose based on specific needs
Values open source and self-hosting
Values: Right tool for the job, community, features
Search intent: "temps vs dokploy", "dokploy alternative"
Decision timeline: Actively comparing before deployment

Key Content to Include

1. Quick Comparison Table

Both self-hosted
Core features
Technology stack
UI/UX approach
Database support
Docker/compose support
Resource requirements

2. Similarities

Self-hosted platforms
Git-based deployments
Docker support
Environment management
Team features
SSL automation

3. When to Choose Temps

Prefer [specific UX philosophy]
Want [specific feature difference]
Value [specific technical approach]
Better for [specific use case]
Simpler [specific aspect]

4. When to Choose Dokploy

Need database deployments
Prefer Docker Compose deployments
Want specific Dokploy features
Fits your workflow better

5. Technical Comparison

Architecture differences
Stack technology
Resource efficiency
Performance characteristics
Scalability approach

6. Feature Differences

Deployment methods
Database handling (Dokploy has it, Temps doesn't)
Monitoring capabilities
Backup strategies
Update mechanisms

7. Setup & Maintenance

Installation complexity
Update process
Resource usage
Maintenance overhead

8. Use Case Fit

Best use cases for Temps
Best use cases for Dokploy
When to choose each

Success Metrics

User clearly understands differences
User can match their needs to right platform
Fair comparison builds trust
User confident in choosing Temps
Clear differentiation points