Temps vs Railway
Page Goal
Position Temps as the self-hosted alternative to Railway with more control and predictable costs. Appeal to developers who love Railway's simplicity but want ownership.
Target Persona
Railway Ryan - A developer who:
- Currently on Railway
- Loves the simplicity
- Concerned about usage-based pricing
- Wants similar DX but self-hosted
- May have cost concerns as apps scale
- Values: Great DX, cost predictability, control
- Search intent: "railway alternative self-hosted"
- Decision timeline: Cost-conscious, evaluating options
Key Content to Include
1. Quick Comparison Table
- Pricing model (usage vs fixed)
- Hosting type
- Database deployment (Railway has, Temps doesn't)
- Docker support
- Framework support
- Team features
2. Similarities
- Git-based deployments
- Great developer experience
- Environment variables management
- Multiple apps/services
- Logs and monitoring
3. When to Choose Temps
- Want predictable costs (no usage-based surprises)
- Prefer self-hosting
- Don't need managed databases (use external)
- High-traffic applications
- Full infrastructure control
- Privacy/compliance needs
4. When to Choose Railway
- Want fully managed databases
- Prefer pay-as-you-go
- No desire to manage infrastructure
- Need hands-off platform
- Small to medium projects
5. Key Differences
- Hosting: Railway managed, Temps self-hosted
- Databases: Railway offers managed DBs, Temps doesn't (use external)
- Pricing: Railway usage-based, Temps infrastructure cost only
- Control: Temps gives you full server access
6. Migration Considerations
- Applications migrate easily
- Need external database solution
- Same Git workflow
- Similar environment variable setup
7. Cost Comparison
- Railway: Starts free, scales with usage ($5-50+/month typical)
- Temps: VPS cost ($5-20/month fixed, unlimited apps)
- Break-even analysis
Success Metrics
- User understands self-hosted vs managed tradeoff
- User knows database deployment difference
- Clear value for cost-conscious users
- Path to migration is clear