Temps vs Netlify

Page Goal

Convert Netlify users seeking more flexibility and cost control. Show that Temps offers similar ease-of-use with more power and less limitations.

Target Persona

Netlify Nancy - A developer who:

Using Netlify for static sites or JAMstack
Hitting build minute limits
Wants backend deployment too
Frustrated with function limits
Needs more than static hosting
Values: Simplicity, cost savings, full-stack capability
Search intent: "netlify alternative", "netlify limits"
Decision timeline: Exploring alternatives

Key Content to Include

1. Quick Comparison Table

Pricing model
Build minutes
Function execution time
Backend support
Framework support
Team features

2. When to Choose Temps

Need unlimited build minutes
Want to deploy backends too (not just static)
High-traffic sites (bandwidth costs)
Need longer-running functions
Want full infrastructure control
Self-hosting preference

3. When to Choose Netlify

Want fully managed platform
Only need static + simple functions
Prefer SaaS over self-hosted
Use Netlify-specific features heavily

4. Feature Comparison

Static hosting: Both excellent
Forms: Netlify has built-in, Temps needs integration
Functions: Temps has more flexibility
Build caching: Both support
Preview deployments: Both support
Backend APIs: Temps supports fully, Netlify limited

5. What Works Better on Temps

Full-stack applications
Long-running processes
Custom Docker deployments
High build volume
Complex backend logic

6. Migration Guide

Most sites work with zero changes
netlify.toml → Temps configuration
Forms alternative solutions
Function migration

7. Pricing Example

Netlify: $19/month Pro (limited) vs $99/month (more builds)
Temps: VPS cost only, unlimited builds

Success Metrics

User sees Temps as "Netlify plus more"
User understands migration is straightforward
Clear path to trying Temps
Confidence in full-stack capabilities