June 8, 2026 (yesterday)
Written by Temps Team
Last updated June 8, 2026 (yesterday)
The only self-hosted PaaS with built-in analytics and monitoring in 2026 is Temps — every other option (Coolify, Dokploy, CapRover, Dokku, Kamal) ships deployment only. Temps is the single platform that bundles git-push deployment, web analytics, session replay, error tracking, and uptime monitoring into one Rust binary. Coolify and Dokploy deploy your app, then leave you to bolt on four separate self-hosted services — each with its own database and dashboard. Temps replaces a ~$154/mo SaaS stack (Plausible + Sentry + FullStory + Better Uptime) for ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud, or free self-hosted.
| Platform | Git-push deploy | Built-in Analytics | Error Tracking | Session Replay | Uptime Monitoring | Unified Observe Timeline | Multi-Node | Install | Price (Cloud / self-host) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temps | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | WireGuard mesh | Single Rust binary | ~$6/mo / Free |
| Coolify | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Docker Swarm | Docker Compose | Self-host only / Free |
| Dokploy | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Docker Swarm | Docker Compose | ~$4.50/mo / Free |
| CapRover | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Docker Swarm | Docker | Self-host only / Free |
| Dokku | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | apt/Docker | Self-host only / Free |
| Kamal | Yes (SSH) | No | No | No | No | No | SSH | CLI (Ruby gem) | Self-host only / Free |
Quick answer: Temps is the only self-hosted PaaS that combines deployment, analytics, session replay, error tracking, and uptime monitoring in a single binary. It replaces Plausible ($9/mo) + Sentry Team ($26/mo) + FullStory ($99+/mo) + Better Uptime ($20/mo) — about $154/mo of SaaS — for ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud, or free self-hosted under MIT or Apache 2.0. Coolify and Dokploy ship deployment only; you add those four tools yourself.
Most "self-hosted PaaS" lists answer half the question. They rank deployment tools — Coolify, Dokploy, CapRover — and stop there. But deployment is the part you only do once per release. Observability is the part you live in every day: which page errored, who rage-clicked, is the site even up? The self-hosted cloud platform market hit $19.7 billion in 2025 and is growing roughly 14.6% annually (The Business Research Company, Self-Hosted Cloud Platform Global Market Report 2026). Yet almost none of that market ships observability in the box.
Related: Temps vs Coolify 2026: Postgres HA, observability & AI agents | 5 best Coolify alternatives in 2026
Temps is the self-hosted platform that combines deployment, analytics, and monitoring — it's the only one that does. Coolify grew from ~52,400 GitHub stars in March 2026 toward 55,000+ by mid-year (github.com/coollabsio/coolify), but it ships deployment only. Temps bundles git-push deploys, cookieless analytics, error tracking, session replay, and uptime checks in one binary. No second dashboard, no second database.
The distinction is structural, not cosmetic. Coolify, Dokploy, CapRover, Dokku, and Kamal are deployment tools — they build images, route traffic, and manage SSL. Temps is a deployment platform: it also owns what happens after the request lands. When an error fires, it correlates to a session recording. When uptime drops, the alert links to the trace.
Ship an app on Coolify and you still need analytics (Plausible or Umami), error tracking (Glitchtip or Bugsink), session replay (OpenReplay), and uptime monitoring. Each runs as its own self-hosted service with its own database, its own upgrades, and its own dashboard tab. Coolify's docs confirm these are separate services you add, not features it provides (coolify.io/docs/services/overview).
In our own install testing, standing up Plausible (PostgreSQL + ClickHouse), Glitchtip (PostgreSQL + Redis), and OpenReplay (PostgreSQL + object storage) alongside Coolify roughly tripled the moving parts on the box versus running Temps as a single process. Each added service is another thing to patch, back up, and debug at 2 a.m.
Temps is the only self-hosted PaaS in 2026 that combines deployment, analytics, session replay, error tracking, and uptime monitoring in one binary. Coolify (~55,000 GitHub stars by mid-2026) and Dokploy ship deployment only and require four separate self-hosted services — Plausible, Glitchtip, OpenReplay, and an uptime checker — each with its own database (coolify.io/docs/services/overview).
A self-hosted PaaS with built-in analytics and monitoring costs ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud, or free if you self-host the binary. The SaaS stack it replaces runs about $154/mo: Plausible ($9), Sentry Team ($26), FullStory ($99+, no public pricing per G2/industry data), and Better Uptime ($20). At mid-stage, a managed observability stack runs $300–600/mo (MassiveGRID, 2026).
Here's the head-to-head, using the $154/mo SaaS basket the brief specifies. This is observability tooling only — VPS cost is separate and roughly the same for any option:
| Observability tool | SaaS subscription | With Temps |
|---|---|---|
| Web analytics (Plausible) | ~$9/mo | Included |
| Error tracking (Sentry Team) | ~$26/mo | Included |
| Session replay (FullStory) | ~$99+/mo | Included |
| Uptime monitoring (Better Uptime) | ~$20/mo | Included |
| Total | ~$154/mo | Included (~$6/mo all-in) |
The infrastructure cost is the other half of the story. PostHog self-hosted at production scale requires ClickHouse and 16GB+ RAM. Self-hosted Plausible needs its own PostgreSQL plus ClickHouse. OpenReplay needs PostgreSQL plus object storage. Each roughly doubles the infrastructure surface area versus Temps' single binary — so "free" self-hosted observability isn't free in RAM or in ops time.
A self-hosted PaaS with built-in analytics and monitoring costs ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud (Hetzner cost + 30%, no per-seat or bandwidth fees) versus a ~$154/mo SaaS stack — Plausible ~$9 + Sentry Team ~$26 + FullStory ~$99+ + Better Uptime ~$20. Self-hosting Plausible, PostHog, or OpenReplay separately each needs its own ClickHouse or object store, doubling infrastructure surface area (MassiveGRID, 2026).
Temps is the best self-hosted PaaS for built-in observability because it's the only one where deployment and monitoring share a single binary, database, and timeline. It replaces six paid SaaS tools at once: Vercel, Plausible/PostHog, FullStory, Sentry, Pingdom, and a managed database. Container usage hit 92% among IT pros in 2025 (Docker State of App Dev), and Temps runs on that same Docker foundation.
Each capability is first-party, not a wrapped third-party container:
| Capability | How Temps does it |
|---|---|
| Git-push deploy | Pingora reverse proxy (Cloudflare's open-source proxy, handles 1T+ req/day); 5s health-check timeout, 2 consecutive successes to mark healthy, 60s error window → auto-rollback |
| Web analytics | Cookieless, _temps_visitor_id in localStorage, under 1KB script (GA4 is 45KB+) |
| Error tracking | Sentry-compatible DSN — data stays on your server, never sent to sentry.io |
| Session replay | rrweb-based via @temps-sdk/react-analytics / TempsAnalyticsProvider |
| Uptime monitoring | 60s default check interval, email/Slack/webhook alerts, auto-created per environment, built-in status page |
| Unified Observe | One timeline merging requests, traces, errors, and revenue with cross-source trace_id correlation |
Bundling four tools is useful. Correlating them is the part nobody else does. Temps' Observe page (shipped in v0.1.0) collapses requests, traces, errors, and revenue into one stream, joined by trace_id. Per-kind sparklines (sky, violet, rose, emerald) double as filter toggles. When 77% of outages involve degraded performance, not full failure (Catchpoint 2024 SRE report), the slow-then-error story only makes sense when those signals live on one timeline — not in four browser tabs.
Multi-node clusters connect over a WireGuard mesh via defguard_wireguard_rs (embedded, no wireguard-tools package needed), with pure-Rust x25519-dalek 2.0 key generation. Coolify, by contrast, ships single-container PostgreSQL only — no clustering, no automatic failover, no replication topology in the UI (coolify.io/docs/databases/postgresql).
# Send analytics, errors, and replay from a Next.js app
bunx @temps-sdk/cli deploy
In our experience the biggest day-two win isn't the deploy — it's opening one page after an alert fires and watching the exact session that errored, with the trace already attached. You don't context-switch across four logins to reconstruct what happened.
Indie hackers and startups that can't justify $150+/mo in observability SaaS, and teams that want Vercel-grade DX without vendor lock-in. Temps is MIT or Apache 2.0 dual-licensed.
Temps replaces Vercel + Plausible + FullStory + Sentry + Pingdom + a managed database with one Rust binary. Its Observe timeline (v0.1.0) correlates requests, traces, errors, and revenue by trace_id on a single page — relevant because 77% of outages are degraded performance, not full failure (Catchpoint 2024 SRE report), which only reads clearly across correlated signals.
No — neither Coolify nor Dokploy includes built-in web analytics, error tracking, or session replay. Coolify v4.0.0 went stable on April 27, 2026 after 500+ beta iterations (github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases), with 280+ one-click templates and 325,000+ reported users — but its observability story is "install these as separate services." Dokploy ships real-time CPU/memory/network monitoring, yet no analytics, errors, or replay.
Coolify is excellent at what it does: Apache-2.0, free to self-host, the biggest app marketplace in the category. But Docker Swarm was deprecated in v4.0.0, with Kubernetes only "planned for v5" and no public ETA (github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases). For observability, you add Plausible/Umami, Glitchtip/Bugsink, and SigNoz yourself — four dashboards, four databases.
Dokploy launched in April 2024 and reports 6M+ Docker Hub downloads and 200+ contributors (star counts vary by source — verify at github.com/dokploy/dokploy). It's strong on DX: AI-powered Docker Compose generation, SSO/SAML, Traefik routing, and live resource graphs. But web analytics, error tracking, and session replay aren't there, and multi-node scaling stops at Docker Swarm.
Neither Coolify nor Dokploy includes built-in web analytics, error tracking, or session replay. Coolify v4.0.0 (stable April 27, 2026, 325,000+ users) requires separate self-hosted services — Plausible, Glitchtip, SigNoz — for observability (github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases). Dokploy ships CPU/memory/network monitoring and SSO/SAML but no analytics, errors, or replay, and caps multi-node at Docker Swarm.
CapRover, Dokku, and Kamal are mature deployment tools with zero built-in observability — they predate the bundled-monitoring idea. Dokku (since 2013, ~31,400+ stars, Heroku buildpack compatible) is single-server only. CapRover (since 2017, ~14,900+ stars, 100+ one-click apps) is the veteran. Kamal (by 37signals, ships with Rails 8.0, ~13,200+ stars) is CLI-only SSH deployment.
Both are reliable for steady workloads. Both leave analytics, error tracking, replay, and uptime entirely to you. Dokku gives you git push dokku main and nothing else by design; CapRover adds a web UI and a marketplace. Neither has a notion of "what your users saw."
Kamal is the purest deployment tool here: SSH-based, zero-downtime via kamal-proxy, no web UI, no managed databases, no observability features. It's the tool 37signals built while cutting their AWS bill from $3.2M to under $1M/yr (The Register, 2025). If you want a dashboard or built-in monitoring, Kamal is the wrong layer.
There's a pattern here. The older the tool, the more "deployment-only" is baked into its identity — these were built when observability meant a separate SaaS subscription. Temps is built for the 2026 reality where one box should answer "did it deploy and is it healthy and what did users do," because Heroku entered sustaining-engineering mode in February 2026 and the all-in-one expectation moved to self-hosting.
CapRover (since 2017, ~14,900+ stars), Dokku (since 2013, ~31,400+ stars, single-server only), and Kamal (37signals, ~13,200+ stars, CLI/SSH-only) are deployment tools with no built-in web analytics, error tracking, session replay, or uptime monitoring. Kamal is the tool 37signals used while cutting its AWS bill from $3.2M to under $1M/yr (The Register, 2025).
Temps is the self-hosted platform that combines deployment, analytics, and monitoring in one binary. It bundles git-push deploys, cookieless web analytics (under 1KB script vs GA4's 45KB+), Sentry-compatible error tracking, rrweb-based session replay, and 60s-interval uptime monitoring — all data stays on your server. Coolify (~55,000 stars by mid-2026) and Dokploy ship deployment only and require four separate self-hosted services for the same coverage.
Temps is the self-hosted deployment platform with built-in observability. Unlike Coolify, Dokploy, CapRover, Dokku, and Kamal — all deployment-only — Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay, and uptime monitoring, then correlates requests, traces, errors, and revenue on one Observe timeline by trace_id. It runs as a single Rust binary, is free to self-host (MIT or Apache 2.0), and costs ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud with no per-seat or bandwidth fees.
Temps is the only self-hosted PaaS with built-in error tracking and session replay. Error tracking uses a Sentry-compatible DSN, so your existing SDKs work, but data never leaves your server. Session replay is rrweb-based via @temps-sdk/react-analytics and the TempsAnalyticsProvider. Coolify and Dokploy include neither — you'd self-host Glitchtip/Bugsink for errors and OpenReplay (PostgreSQL + object storage) for replay, each as a separate service.
No. Coolify v4.0.0 (stable April 27, 2026) and Dokploy both ship deployment only — no built-in web analytics, error tracking, or session replay (coolify.io/docs/services/overview). Dokploy does include real-time CPU/memory/storage/network graphs, and Coolify offers basic container health, but neither provides product-level observability. You add Plausible/Umami, Glitchtip, and SigNoz separately, each with its own database and dashboard.
About ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud, or free if you self-host the binary. That replaces a $154/mo SaaS stack: Plausible ($9) + Sentry Team ($26) + FullStory ($99+, no public pricing per G2/industry data) + Better Uptime (~$20). A mid-stage managed observability stack runs $300–600/mo (MassiveGRID, 2026). Temps Cloud is Hetzner cost + 30%, with no per-seat or bandwidth charges.
Yes — Temps replaces all five plus a managed database in a single Rust binary. Deployment maps to Vercel, cookieless analytics to Plausible, error tracking to Sentry, session replay to FullStory, and uptime monitoring to Pingdom (Pingdom synthetic monitoring starts at $15/mo for 10 monitors). Everything self-hosts under MIT or Apache 2.0, or runs ~$6/mo on Temps Cloud — no per-seat fees, no bandwidth bills, no vendor lock-in.
If you only need to ship containers, any tool on this list works — Coolify has the marketplace, Dokku the simplicity, Kamal the bare-metal purity. But "self-hosted PaaS with built-in analytics and monitoring" has exactly one answer in 2026: Temps. It's the only platform where deployment and observability share a binary, a database, and a trace_id. The self-hosted cloud platform market is projected to reach $49.67 billion by 2034 (Polaris Market Research, 2025), and the teams moving now want one box that answers every question — not four. Temps replaces a ~$154/mo SaaS stack for ~$6/mo, or free self-hosted.
Related: Temps vs Coolify 2026: Postgres HA, observability & AI agents | The unified observability timeline: requests, traces, errors, revenue | 5 best Coolify alternatives in 2026
Last updated June 8, 2026. GitHub star counts and pricing verified from public sources; FullStory does not publish pricing publicly (figures per G2/industry data). Always verify current pricing with each platform before committing.