Temps vs Kamal
From deployment tool to full platform
Kamal deploys containers over SSH. Temps gives you that plus a dashboard, git-push deploys, preview environments, and built-in observability — in a single binary.
Monthly cost at a glance
The short answer
Choose Temps if you…
- You want a full PaaS with a web dashboard, not just a CLI tool
- You want git-push deploys without configuring GitHub Actions
- You need built-in analytics, error tracking, and monitoring
- You want preview environments for every pull request
- You need managed databases with HA support
- You don't want to install Ruby or manage a local toolchain
Choose Kamal if you…
- You want the simplest possible deployment — just SSH + Docker
- You prefer a minimal tool with no server-side control plane
- You're deploying Rails apps and want first-party Basecamp tooling
- You already have a mature observability stack you're happy with
- You want zero dependencies on your servers beyond Docker
Why teams switch from Kamal
- Full PaaS, not just a deploy tool
- Kamal is a CLI-only deployment tool — no web UI, no dashboard, no git-push triggers. Temps is a complete platform with a web interface and automated workflows.
- Built-in observability
- Kamal has zero built-in monitoring. You need Sentry, PostHog, Pingdom, and a logging stack separately. Temps includes analytics, error tracking, session replay, and uptime monitoring.
- No Ruby required
- Kamal requires a Ruby environment and Docker on your local machine. Temps is a single Rust binary — install and go.
- Git-push deploys out of the box
- Kamal needs GitHub Actions or CI/CD glue for automated deploys. Temps supports native git-push deployment with zero configuration.
Feature comparison
What each platform includes out of the box, and what needs a separate subscription.
Git push deployments
Temps
YesNativeKamal
NoRequires CI/CD setupWeb dashboard
Temps
YesFull management UIKamal
NoCLI-onlyDocker support
Temps
YesKamal
YesZero-downtime deploys
Temps
YesKamal
YesAutomatic SSL
Temps
YesAutomaticKamal
YesVia kamal-proxyCustom domains
Temps
YesKamal
YesPreview environments
Temps
YesPer pull requestKamal
NoManual setup requiredManaged PostgreSQL
Temps
YesHA clustersKamal
NoDocker accessory (no HA)Managed Redis
Temps
YesIncludedKamal
NoDocker accessoryS3-compatible storage
Temps
YesBuilt-in (RustFS, MinIO supported)Kamal
NoError tracking
Temps
YesSentry-compatibleKamal
NoNot availableAnalytics
Temps
YesPrivacy-first, unlimitedKamal
NoNot availableSession replay
Temps
YesBuilt-inKamal
NoUptime monitoring
Temps
YesBuilt-in checks + alertingKamal
NoNot availableTransactional email
Temps
YesSMTP, SES, Scaleway, Cloudflare built inKamal
NoMulti-server support
Temps
YesKamal
YesRolling deployments
Temps
YesKamal
YesOpen source
Temps
YesMIT / Apache 2.0Kamal
YesMIT
What it actually costs
Both are free and open-source. But Kamal is a deployment tool only — adding a dashboard, observability, managed databases, and preview environments means integrating 5+ separate tools. Temps includes everything.
| Scenario | Temps | Kamal |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted | $0 | $0 |
| Cloud version | From $6/mo | N/A (no cloud offering) |
| With full observability | $0 (included) | $0 + several tools to run yourself, or $50–150+/mo SaaS |
| With managed databases | $0 (included, HA) | $0 (basic Docker containers, no HA) |
Migrating from Kamal
Easy difficulty
Kamal apps are Docker-based, so your images port directly. Replace the kamal.yml deploy config with a Temps service definition — most settings have direct equivalents. You gain a web dashboard and native git-push automation that replaces the manual SSH-based deploy workflow. The main learning curve is un-learning Kamal's CLI-centric approach, not any app code changes.
Ready to switch from Kamal?
Self-host Temps for free, or run it on Temps Cloud from ~$6/mo.